Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Vunisa v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCA 333 File number: NSD 1270 of 2020
Judgment of: THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 8 April 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for an extension of time to seek judicial review of a decision of the Minister for Home Affairs not to revoke a visa cancellation decision under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – insufficient merit to warrant a grant of leave – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476A(1), 501(3A), 501CA(3), 501CA(4)
Cases cited: Goundar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1203 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo (2018) 267 FCR 320 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 264 CLR 541; 357 ALR 408 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v Viane [2021] HCA 41; 395 ALR 403 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 3; 267 FCR 200
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 23
Date of hearing: 4 April 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr GJ Johnson
Solicitor for the Respondent Sparke Helmore Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 1270 of 2020
BETWEEN: EMORI VUNISA Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate