Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
RGCZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 348 Review of: RGCZ and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] AATA 3051
File number(s): VID 542 of 2021
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 6 April 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application to review decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the Tribunal failed to appreciate the different interests of each of the Applicant's children and failed to comply with Direction 90, and thus failed to comply with s 499(2) of the Act – Application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 37
Date of hearing: 4 April 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Aleksov
Solicitor for the Applicant: Clothier Anderson Immigration Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J Barrington
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS VID 542 of 2021
BETWEEN: RGCZ Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS Respondent
order made by: ANDERSON J DATE OF ORDER: 6 April 2022
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application will be dismissed. 2. The Applicant will pay the Respondent's costs on a lump sum basis to be agreed, or as determined by a Registrar of the Court. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
ANDERSON J:
introduction 1 By application filed 22 September 2021, the Applicant seeks judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) made on 26 August 2021 to affirm a decision of a delegate (delegate) of the First Respondent (Minister) to refuse to grant the Applicant a Partner (Provisional) (Class UF) visa (Visa) under s 501(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Act).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate