Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
AFP20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 375 Appeal from: AFP20 v Minister for Immigration Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCCA 3207
File number: NSD 1341 of 2020
Judgment of: THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 12 April 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court orders dismissing application for judicial review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal decision – Tribunal affirmed decision of a delegate of the first respondent to refuse the appellant's Protection Visa application – where there was an error in interpretation (being an omission) of the appellant's evidence before the Tribunal – whether primary judge erred in not finding that the error in interpretation was material to the Tribunal's exercise of power giving rise to jurisdictional error – whether the appellant was denied the hearing required under s 425 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – primary judge should have found jurisdictional error established – appeal allowed with costs
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Div 4 of Pt 7, s 425
Cases cited: AXR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 42; 163 ALD 296 DTN16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services & Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1525 Perera v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 507; 92 FCR 6 SZFDE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 35; 232 CLR 189 SZRMQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 142; 219 FCR 212 SZSEI v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 465 SZTFQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 562
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate