Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Fair Work Ombudsman v Spotless Services Australia Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 383 File number: WAD 636 of 2017
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 12 April 2022
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW - consideration of appropriate pecuniary penalties for contravention of s 119(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) - where employer did not pay redundancy payments to certain terminated employees - where employer failed in its reliance on the 'ordinary and customary turnover of labour' exception in s 119(1)(a) - whether reasonableness of legal argument should discount penalty - whether consistency requires penalty to be calculated in same manner as applied to similar contravention by other company in the same group - consideration of deterrence and other factors
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 119, 557
Cases cited: Australian & International Pilots Association v Qantas Airways Limited [2009] FCA 500 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Powell (No 2) [2019] FCA 972 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 629 Berkeley Challenge Pty Ltd v United Voice [2020] FCAFC 113; (2020) 279 FCR 249 Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; (2015) 258 CLR 482 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2007] FCA 1607 Compass Group (Australia) Pty Ltd v National Union of Workers [2015] FWCFB 8040; (2015) 253 IR 32 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Hail Creek Coal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 480 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Alpha Flight Services Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 118 Fair Work Ombudsman v Spotless Services Australia Ltd [2019] FCA 9 Fashion Fair Pty Ltd v Department of Industrial Relations (Inspector Rouse) (1999) 92 IR 271 Flight Centre Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 53; (2018) 260 FCR 68 Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177; (2020) 282 FCR 580 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1990] FCA 762 Transport Workers' Union v Veolia Environmental Service (Australia) Pty Ltd [2013] NSWIRComm 22 United Voice v Berkeley Challenge Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1189 United Voice v Berkeley Challenge Pty Limited [2018] FCA 224 Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] FCAFC 193; (2003) 131 FCR 529 Visy Paper Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2005] FCAFC 236
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate