Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Tapiki v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 391 Appeal from: Tapiki and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Migration) [2021] AATA 1228
File number(s): NSD 520 of 2021
Judgment of: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 14 April 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where the Tribunal affirmed a decision of a delegate of the first respondent to refuse a request to revoke the cancellation of the applicant's visa – where no meaningful submissions made as to error – where no error on the part of the Tribunal otherwise identifiable – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 499, 501(3A), 501CA
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 22
Date of hearing: 22 March 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared on his own behalf
Counsel for the First Respondent: T Reilly
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore
ORDERS NSD 520 of 2021
BETWEEN: KINGSTON TAPIKI Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
order made by: BROMWICH J DATE OF ORDER: 14 April 2022
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The originating application dated 1 June 2021 be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs as assessed or agreed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate