Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Sackl v Auslink Investment Co. Associates Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 402 Appeal from: B Pty Ltd v Sutton [2020] FCCA 3068
File number(s): NSD 1337 of 2020
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 21 April 2022
Catchwords: COSTS – whether lump sum costs should be awarded – where first respondent sought a lump sum and appellant sought taxation – where appellant bankrupt – appellant to pay costs of first respondent to be agreed or taxed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 35A(1)(h) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 3.01(1)(b), 40.02(b), Schedule 2, Item 221
Cases cited: Auslink Investment Co Associates Pty Ltd v Sackl [2019] NSWSC 1227 Auslink Investment Co Associates Pty Ltd v Sackl [2020] NSWSC 640 Billingsley v Napoli [2021] FCA 526 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 146; (2017) 253 FCR 403
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 14
Date of last submission/s: 25 March 2022
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Solicitor for the Appellant: Mr C Dale of Christopher Dale Solicitor
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr C D Freeman
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Goodwin & Co Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 1337 of 2020
BETWEEN: JAMES SACKL Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate