Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Fathima v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 441 Appeal from: Fathima v Minister for Immigration [2021] FCCA 796
File number: VID 269 of 2021
Judgment of: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 28 April 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia – student visa – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal failed to consider significant material – whether the Tribunal failed to give proper, genuine and realistic consideration to the appellant's submissions and supporting evidence
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 360 Migration Regulations 1994, Sch 2, cl 572.223
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT (2013) 212 FCR 99
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 48
Date of hearing: 1 April 2022
Counsel for the Appellants: Mr M Kenneally
Solicitor for the Appellants: Lawson Bayly
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr V Murano
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice, save as to costs
ORDERS VID 269 of 2021
BETWEEN: MASRATH FATHIMA First Appellant
ZAKEER HUSSAIN Second Appellant
JUWARIYAH HUSSAIN Third Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate