Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ibrahim v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 450 Review of Application for judicial review of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal decision delivered on 12 October 2021 File number(s): QUD 356 of 2021
Judgment of: SC DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 29 April 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application to review decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision of Minister's delegate not to revoke mandatory cancellation of a visa under s 501CA decision – whether drug use and/or dependency, considered relevant to the risk of recidivism, ought to have been considered as an independent, albeit unarticulated, claim that 'clearly emerged' – whether a mandatory relevant consideration pursuant to s 9(1)(b) of Direction 90.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 499, 501(3A), 501(6)(a), 501(7)(c), 501CA, 501CA(3)
Cases cited: Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 109; 278 FCR 627 AWT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 512 AYY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 89; 261 FCR 503 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34; 268 CLR 29 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; 252 FCR 352 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; 73 ALD 321 El Khoueiry v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 247 Goundar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1203 Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 92; 233 FCR 315 Hong v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 55; 269 FCR 47 Hong v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCATrans 230 Jones v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 285 LRMM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1039 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo [2018] FCAFC 151; 267 FCR 320 Minister for Home Affairs v HSKJ [2018] FCAFC 217; 266 FCR 591 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; 390 ALR 590 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; 144 FCR 1 Raibevu v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 35
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate