Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Wilson Security v Gucic [2022] FCA 477 File number: VID 58 of 2022
Judgment of: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 29 April 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether non-party is entitled to inspect documents pursuant to s 2.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether principle of open justice is engaged only when the relevant material is "used" or "deployed" in open court – leave refused
Legislation: Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth), s 17 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 2.32
Cases cited: Baptist Union of Queensland – Carinity v Roberts [2015] FCA 1068; 241 FCR 135 Brown v Health Services Union (No 4) [2012] FCA 1376 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hawkins [2016] FCA 164; 341 ALR 255 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v District Court (NSW) [2004] NSWCA 324; 61 NSWLR 344 Seven Network Limited v News Limited (No 9) [2005] FCA 1394
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 15
Date of last submissions: 11 March 2022
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Solicitor for the Defendants: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
ORDERS VID 58 of 2022
BETWEEN: WILSON SECURITY PTY LTD (ACN 127 406 295) Plaintiff
AND: MICHAEL GUCIC First Defendant
CERTIS SECURITY AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 003 762 150) Second Defendant
order made by: ANASTASSIOU J DATE OF ORDER: 29 April 2022
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate