Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Miller v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 489 Appeal from: Application for judicial review from: Miller and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] AATA 1623 (8 June 2021)
File number: NSD 713 of 2021
Judgment of: DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 4 May 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review of Tribunal's decision – application not made in compliance with s 29(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – application failed to attach a statement of reasons identifying why the Minister's decision was erroneous – whether failure to include statement invalidated application
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Administrative Appeals Tribunals Tribunal Regulation 2015 (Cth)
Cases cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (2009) 239 CLR 27 Beiruti v Commissioner of Taxation (2013) 138 ALD 380 Certain Lloyds Underwriters v Cross (2012) 248 CLR 378 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Pty Ltd (2012) 250 CLR 503 Luck v the Secretary, Department of Human Services (No. 4) [2016] FCA 950 Minister for Home Affairs v Brown (2020) 376 ALR 133 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Chan (2008) 172 FCR 193 Montreal Street Railway Co v Normandin [1917] AC 170 Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2011) 244 CLR 144 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Regional Express Holdings Ltd v Australian Federation of Air Pilots (2017) 262 CLR 456
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate