Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Qin v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 490 Appeal from: Qin v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCCA 1566
File number: NSD 815 of 2021
Judgment of: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION –appeal – where primary judge dismissed application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal to affirm decision of Minister's delegate to refuse to grant appellant a subclass 820 Partner visa – where appellant did not satisfy cl 820.211(2)(d)(ii) of Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) and delegate found there were no compelling reasons for waiving Sch 3 criteria – where review available only for jurisdictional error –whether primary judge erred by failing to have regard to the genuineness and long-lasting nature of the relationship – whether primary judge erred by failing to have regard to the emotional hardship of separation during IVF treatment and procedure PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether leave should be granted to enable applicant to allege errors by Tribunal not raised below
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5F, 14, 65, 348, 476, 499 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) sch 2 cl 155.212, sch 3 cll 820.21, 820.211 Migration Regulations (Amendment) 1996 No 75 (Cth)
Cases cited: Ali v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1166 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 Babicci v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 141 FCR 285 Choi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 291 CQV16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1098 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (No 2) (1979) 2 ALD 634 Hassan v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 2014 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNPG [2010] FCAFC 51; 115 ALD 303 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v EGZ17 [2022] FCAFC 12 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17, 95 ALJR 441 NADH of 2001 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 328 Paduano v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 143 FCR 204 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 258 CLR 173 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte H [2001] HCA 28; 75 ALJR 982 Sagnata Investments Ltd v Norwich Corporation [1971] 2 QB 614 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 238 FCR 588 Waensila v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 241 FCR 121
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate