Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Yatala Labour Prison Case) [2022] FCA 492 File number(s): SAD 1 of 2022
Judgment of: O'SULLIVAN J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – oral application pursuant to rr 17.01(3) and 16.53 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) for leave to file a further amended statement of claim – whether the pleading stated with sufficient clarity the case that must be met – whether the proposed amended statement of claim is likely to cause embarrassment in the proceedings, failed to disclose a reasonable cause of action and/or result in duplicity – whether further particularisation is required – application dismissed – further particulars required
Legislation: Crimes Act 1914-1946 (Cth), s 5 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 348, 363, 499, 500, 550, 550(2)(a) & (c), 556, 793 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936-1944 (Cth), s 230 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 75B, 75B(a) & (c) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 16.12, 16.21(1)(d) & (e), 16.33, 16.51(1), 17.01(3)
Cases cited: Agar v Hyde [2000] HCA 41; (2000) 201 CLR 552 Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia & NZ Banking Group Ltd [1994] FCA 636, (1994) 217 ALR 226 (reported Beaumont J 13/9/94) Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hall and Others [2018] FCAFC 83; (2018) 261 FCR 347 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Kevin Pattinson and Anor [2022] HCA 13 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v McDermott (No 2) [2017] FCA 797; (2017) 252 FCR 393 Banque Commerciale SA (En Liquidation) v Akhil Holdings Ltd [1990] HCA 11; (1990) 169 CLR 279 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners [1949] HCA 1; (1949) 78 CLR 62 Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FCA 1293 Esso Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union [2016] FCAFC 72; (2016) 245 FCR 39 Fair Work Ombudsman v Eastern Colour Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 803; (2011) 209 IR 263 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; (1964) 112 CLR 125 Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473 Hamilton v Whitehead [1988] HCA 65; (1988) 166 CLR 121 Mallan v Lee [1949] HCA 48, (1949) 80 CLR 198 McSteen v Architects Registration Board of Victoria [2018] VSCA 96 Parker v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2019] FCAFC 56; (2019) 270 FCR 39 Polar Aviation Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority and Ors [2012] FCAFC 97 Radisich v McDonald [2010] FCA 762; (2010) 198 IR 244 Rafferty v Madgwicks [2012] FCAFC 37; (2012) 287 ALR 437 Research in Motion Ltd v Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 320; (2009) 176 FCR 66 Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2002] FCAFC 213; (2002) 118 FCR 236 Walsh v Tattersalls [1996] HCA 26; (1996) 188 CLR 77 Yorke v Lucas [1985] HCA 65; (1985) 158 CLR 661
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate