Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
DMQ20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 514 Appeal from: Application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal delivered on 22 June 2020 by Member Tigiilagi Eteuati
File number(s): QUD 323 of 2020
Judgment of: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming the respondent's decision that the applicant was not eligible for a protection visa pursuant to s 36(1C)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whereas the applicant was convicted of a serious crime for the purposes of s 36(1C)(b) – whether the Tribunal applied the correct test as to posing a danger to the Australian community – whether the Tribunal failed to properly consider relevant evidence – correct test so applied – relevant evidence was considered and weighted correctly – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: Abebe v The Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Splendido [2019] FCAFC 132 BCR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 96 DCR19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 229 DOB18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 63 EBD20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 334 MHCZ and Minister for Home Affairs (Migration) [2019] AATA 4259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32 SZOQQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 40 WKCG and Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] AATA 512
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate