Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
EVI19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 518 Appeal from: EVI19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCCA 1105
File number: NSD 594 of 2021
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court dismissal of an application for review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority ("IAA") in respect of an "unauthorised maritime arrival" – where IAA affirmed a decision of a delegate of the Minister not to grant the appellant a protection visa – where IAA made adverse credibility findings – where IAA embarked upon a "quest to disbelieve" and rejected every integer of the appellant's claims – where numerous factual findings made irrationally and without any evidential basis – where findings of inconsistency not explained and their significance assessed – where reasons cursory; even perfunctory – whether decision unreasonable – appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 46A, 473CA, 473CC
Cases cited: ASB17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 38; 368 FCR 271 AVQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 133; 266 FCR 83 AWU16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 513 BQQ15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 218 CGQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146; 253 FCR 496 DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2; 258 FCR 175 Djokovic v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 3; 397 ALR 1 DQM18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 110; 278 FCR 529 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; 264 CLR 123 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services & Multicultural Affairs v Viane [2021] HCA 41; 395 ALR 403 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; 390 ALR 590 Plaintiff S183/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 15 Republic of Nauru v WET040 (No 2) [2018] HCA 60; 362 ALR 235 SZFTQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 562 SZHYH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 3) [2019] FCA 589; 165 ALD 463 SZLGP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1198 SZSHV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 253 W375/01A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 89; 67 ALD 757 Hathaway J and Foster M, The Law of Refugee Status (CUP, 2nd ed, 2014)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate