Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Roberts-Smith v Roberts [2022] FCA 524 File number: NSD 75 of 2022
Judgment of: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 16 May 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – consideration of cumulative and related criteria in Re Décor Corporation Pty Ltd and Rian Tooling Industries Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 – whether failure to consider or give sufficient weight to matters undermining first respondent's affidavit evidence – whether arguable case existed for injunctive relief to join other parties – no determination of substantive right or practical effect of finally determining rights – no substantial injustice established – decision not attended with sufficient doubt – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 25(2), 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 35.13(a)
Cases cited: Aardwolf Industries LLC v Tayeh [2020] NSWCA 301 Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Phillip Morris Incorporated (1981) 148 CLR 170 Advanced Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2020) 281 FCR 149; [2020] FCAFC 157 Ah-Chee v Stuart [2019] FCAFC 165 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Brimaud v Honeysett Instant Print Pty Ltd (1988) 217 ALR 44 Cabcharge Australia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2010] FCAFC 111 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v One Key Workforce Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 27 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2016) 242 FCR 153; [2016] FCAFC 97 Davidson v Official Receiver [2021] FCAFC 73 Ex parte Bucknell (1936) 56 CLR 221 Hastwell v Kott Gunning [2021] FCAFC 70 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651; [2010] HCA 21 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 In re the Will of F. B. Gilbert (dec.) (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564; [2000] FCA 1572 Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Rawson Finances Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2016] FCAFC 95 Rawson Finances Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCAFC 139 Re Décor Corporation Pty Ltd and Rian Tooling Industries Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397; [1991] FCA 844 Roberts-Smith v Roberts [2022] FCA 18 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd v Apple Inc. (2011) 217 FCR 238; [2011] FCAFC 156 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Limited (No 2) (1989) 21 FCR 306 Windsor v Sydney Medical Service Co-operative Ltd (No. 2) [2009] FCA 704
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate