Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Baker v Woolworths Group Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 534 File number: NSD 2004 of 2019
Judgment of: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 16 March 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 11 May 2022
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – application for court approval of proposed settlement and discontinuance under s 33V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether the proposed settlement and discontinuance is fair and reasonable in the interests of the group members to be bound to it – parties informed that the Court would not approve the proposed settlement and discontinuance in its present terms– application subsequently withdrawn
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 45, 535, 539, 545, 546, 557A, 570 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 33V, 33ZE, 33ZJ Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) cl 3.34
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Richards [2013] FCAFC 89 Kelly v Willmott Forests (No 4) [2016] FCA 323; 335 ALR 439 Laine v Thiess Pty Ltd [2016] VSC 689 McKenzie v Cash Converters International Ltd (No 3) [2019] FCA 10 Parkin v Boral Limited (Class Closure) [2022] FCAFC 47 Turner v TESA Mining (NSW) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 435 Williams v FAI Home Security Pty Ltd (No 4) [2000] FCA 1925; 180 ALR 459
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate