Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jusand Nominees Pty Ltd v Rattlejack Innovations Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 540 File number(s): VID 311 of 2021
Judgment of: ROFE J
Date of judgment: 16 May 2022
Catchwords: PATENTS – where invention claimed is a safety system for protecting against the hazard of drill rod failure – construction of patent – meaning of "anchor member" – meaning of "a proximal end region of the bore adjacent to a rock-face – whether third respondent's provision of the safety system product was for "experimental purposes" and therefore exempt under s 119C of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) – conduct found not to be for "experimental purposes" – whether respondents infringed patents in suit – held: no infringement by respondents' product PATENTS – validity – lack of support and sufficient description – whether patent meets disclosure requirement of s 40(2)(a) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) – whether claims of patent meet support requirement of s 40(3) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) – grounds of invalidity established
Legislation: Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012 (Cth) Patents Act 1903 (Cth) Patents Act 1990 (Cth) Patents Act 1977 (UK)
Cases cited: AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd (2015) 257 CLR 356 Axent Holdings Pty Ltd t/a Axent Global v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd (2020) 154 IPR 431 Azuko Pty Ltd v Old Digger Pty Ltd (2001) 52 IPR 75 Biogen Inc v Medeva Plc [1997] RPC 1 Bristol-Myers Co v Beecham Group Ltd [1974] AC 646 British United Shoe Machinery Co Ltd v A Fussell & Sons Ltd (1908) 25 RPC 631 Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183 Coretell Pty Ltd v Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd (2017) 124 IPR 210 CSR Building Products Ltd v United States Gypsum Company [2015] APO 72 Cytec Industries Inc v Nalco Company [2021] FCA 970 Eli Lily v Human Genome Sciences [2008] RPC 29 Embrex Inc v Service Engineering Corp 216 F 3d 1343 (Fed Cir, 2000) Evolva SA [2017] APO 57 General Tire & Rubber Company v Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company Ltd [1972] RPC 457 Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] RPC 13 GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Investments (Ireland) (No 2) Limited v Apotex Pty Ltd (2016) 119 IPR 1 Grove Hill Pty Ltd v Great Western Corporation Pty Ltd (2002) 55 IPR 257 H Lundbeck A/S v Generics (UK) Ltd [2008] RPC 19 Hudson, Scott & Sons Ltd v Barringer, Wallis and Manners Ltd (1906) 23 RPC 79 Insta Image Pty Ltd v KD Kanopy Australasia Pty Ltd (2008) 78 IPR 20 Jupiters Ltd v Neurizon Pty Ltd (2005) 65 IPR 86 KD Kanopy Australasia Pty Ltd v Insta Image Pty Ltd (2007) 71 IPR 615 Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Arico Trading International Pty Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 1 Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Multigate Medical Products Pty Ltd (2011) 92 IPR 21 Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd (2004) 64 IPR 444 Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (No 2) (2007) 235 CLR 173 Longworth v Emmerton (1951) 83 CLR 539 Madey v Duke University 307 F 3d 1351 (Fed Cir, 2002) Mentor Corp v Hollister Inc (No 2) [1993] RPC 7 Mentor Corp v Hollister Inc [1991] FSR 557 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation v Wyeth LLC (No 3) [2020] FCA 1477 Micro-Chemicals Ltd v Smith Kline and French Inter-American Ltd [1972] SCR 506 Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Tyco Electronics Pty Ltd (2002) 56 IPR 248 Monsanto Co v Stauffer Chemical Co [1985] RPC 515 Multigate Medical Devices Pty Ltd v B Braun Melsungen AG (2016) 117 IPR 1 Novartis AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1039 Novozymes A/S v Danisco A/S (2013) 99 IPR 417 Product Management Group Pty Ltd v Blue Gentian LLC (2015) 116 IPR 54 Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (2013) 101 IPR 11 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd [2020] UKSC 27 Roche Products Inc v Bolar Pharmaceutical Co 733 F 2d 858 (Fed Cir, 1984) Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Kennametal UK Ltd [2012] RPC 23 Schering Biotech Corp's Application [1993] RPC 249 Tramanco Pty Ltd v BPW Transpec Pty Ltd (2014) 105 IPR 18 Welch Perrin & Co Pty Ltd v Worrel (1961) 106 CLR 588
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate