Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Communications and Media Authority v Jones [2022] FCA 546 File number: QUD 129 of 2022
Judgment of: THOMAS J
Date of judgment: 10 May 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application to dispense with personal service of originating process on the first respondent – application for substituted service on first respondent – Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 10.24 – where personal service on first respondent not practicable – where reasonably probable the applicant's identified methods of substituted service will inform the first respondent – orders made for substituted service
Legislation: Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Windus [2019] FCA 1526 Commissioner of Taxation v Caratti (No 2) [2018] FCA 1500
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 15
Date of hearing: 10 May 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Roche with Mr M Pulsford
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: There was no appearance by the First and Second Respondents
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: Mr D Barker of McGinness & Associates Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate