Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BSL22 v BSM22 [2022] FCA 558 File number: VID 29 of 2022
Judgment of: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 13 May 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory applications for orders pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – orders sought to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice and to protect the safety of the parties by whom the applications made – necessity of relief sought – medical evidence as to consequences of disclosure for applicant's safety – imbalance as between parties in the event that both interlocutory applications not granted productive of prejudice to the proper administration of justice – applications granted
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) pt VAA Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth)
Cases cited: Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 26
Date of hearing: 13 May 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms S Kelly
Solicitor for the Applicant: Workplace Dynamic Australia
Counsel for the First and Third Respondents: Ms R Preston
Solicitor for the First and Third Respondents: Maddocks
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Ms F Knowles
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Gilchrist Connell
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate