Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Nona of behalf of the Badulgal, Mualgal and Kaurareg Peoples (Warral & Ului) v State of Queensland (No 4) [2022] FCA 566 File number: QUD 9 of 2019
Judgment of: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 13 May 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 16 May 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to vacate hearing of expert evidence in contested native title claim – where the expert witness of the moving party affected by catastrophic flooding – relevance of the present proceeding to the resolution of native title claims in neighbouring areas – application granted
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Native Title
Number of paragraphs: 18
Date of hearing: 13 May 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr R Blowes SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr D Knobel of P&E Law
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms N Kidson QC
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms A Olsen of Crown Law (Queensland)
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent did not appear
Counsel for the Third to Seventh respondents: Mr A McAvoy SC
Solicitor for the Third to Seventh respondents: Mr B Bero of Jaramer Legal
Counsel for the Intervener: Ms R Webb QC
Solicitor for the Intervener: Mr G Kennedy of Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS QUD 9 of 2019
BETWEEN: TITOM NONA ON BEHALF OF THE BADULGAL, MUALGAL AND KAURAREG PEOPLES Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate