Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Roberts v Attorney-General (Cth) [2022] FCA 574 File number: NSD 128 of 2022
Judgment of: LEE J
Date of judgment: 18 May 2022
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review of parole decision under s 19AL(1) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – survey of principles informing federal parole decisions – where applicant unable to access offence-specific treatment in custody – whether Attorney-General failed to consider arguments advanced by applicant – whether decision affected by procedural unfairness – whether decision lacked evident and intelligible justification – where Attorney-General balanced risks of release against risks of refusal of parole – where no material deficiencies in information before Attorney-General – application dismissed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 19AL, 19AKA, 19ALA Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) ss 474.19, 474.24A Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 91H
Cases cited: Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; (2017) 252 FCR 352 Commissioner of Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Djokovic v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 3; (2022) 397 ALR 1 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; (2003) 197 ALR 389 DYS21 v Attorney-General (Cth) [2021] FCA 1331 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 264 CLR 123 Keliher v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia [2021] FCA 1641 Khawaja v Attorney-General (Cth) [2022] FCA 334 Khazaal v Attorney-General [2020] FCA 448 Lodhi v Attorney-General (Cth) [2020] FCA 1383 Lopez-Avila v K & S Freighters Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 962; (2015) 68 AAR 86 Masri v Attorney-General (Cth) [2022] FCA 17; (2022) 398 ALR 509 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; (2018) 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH [2015] HCA 40; (2015) 256 CLR 326 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minogue v Victoria [2019] HCA 31; (2019) 268 CLR 1 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; (2021) 390 ALR 590 Pulini v Assistant Minister to the Attorney-General (Cth) [2021] FCA 1543; (2021) 397 ALR 192 R v Roberts [2019] NSWDC 282 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme [2003] HCA 56; (2003) 216 CLR 212 Roncevich v Repatriation Commission [2005] HCA 40; (2005) 222 CLR 115 Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43; (2019) 270 FCR 173 Stephens v Attorney-General [2021] FCA 204 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; (2006) 228 CLR 152
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate