Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Auken Animal Husbandry Pty Ltd v 3rd Solution Investment Pty Ltd (Supplementary reasons) [2022] FCA 583 File number: NSD 2412 of 2018
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 19 May 2022
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – alleged misleading and deceptive conduct resulting in conclusion of improvident agricultural lease – supplementary reasons as to whether case on "usual terms representation" made out – whether pleaded statements made – whether statements give rise to the pleaded representation – whether representation caused entry into the impugned contract
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 22
Date of hearing: 12-28 October 2020, 29 March 2022 and 7 April 2022
Counsel for the Applicant M R Pesman SC and N E Furlan
Solicitor for the Applicant Baker McKenzie
Counsel for the Respondent M Ashurst SC, G Farland and M Keene
Solicitor for the Respondent HWL Ebsworth
ORDERS NSD 2412 of 2018
BETWEEN: AUKEN ANIMAL HUSBANDRY PTY LTD (ACN 611 163 690) Applicant
AND: 3RD SOLUTION INVESTMENT PTY LTD (ACN 610 060 172) First Respondent
CAREY LEE Second Respondent
AND BETWEEN: 3RD SOLUTION INVESTMENT PTY LTD (ACN 610 060 172) Cross-Claimant
AND: AUKEN ANIMAL HUSBANDRY PTY LTD (ACN 611 163 690) Cross-Respondent
order made by: STEWART J DATE OF ORDER: 19 MAY 2022
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Within 14 days of these orders, the parties provide by email to the Associate of Stewart J agreed or competing orders for the disposition of the matter including as to costs. 2. In the event of competing orders, the parties also provide short written submissions in support of their respective positions and which identify any outstanding matters to be dealt with. 3. The making of final orders be dealt with on the papers unless either party seeks an oral hearing, in which event that is to be communicated in the email referred to in order 1. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate