Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Lu v University of New South Wales [2022] FCA 588 File number: NSD 6 of 2022
Judgment of: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 20 May 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — continued non-compliance with Court order — where applicant given repeated opportunities to comply, whether a self-executing order should be made providing for dismissal of proceeding if order not complied with by a particular date and time
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PO(3A)(a) Federal Court of Australia Act 1975 (Cth) ss 37M, 37P Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 5.21, 5.22, 5.23, 34.163
Cases cited: Halliday v Sacs Group Pty Ltd (1993) 67 ALJR 678; 113 ALR 637 Halliday v Sacs Group Pty Ltd (unreported, High Court of Australia, 23 December 1992) James v WorkPower Inc [2018] FCA 2083 Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 388 Oil Basins Ltd v Watson (2017) 252 FCR 420 Welsh v Digilin Pty Ltd (ACN 078 278 449) [2008] FCAFC 149; 250 ALR 13
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 39
Date of hearing: 19 May 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J Mattson
Solicitor for the Respondent: Bartier Perry
ORDERS NSD 6 of 2022
BETWEEN: MIN LU Applicant
AND: UNIVERISTY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate