Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ferdinands v Registrar Stone [2022] FCA 589 File number(s): SAD 10 of 2022
Judgment of: O'SULLIVAN J
Date of judgment: 24 May 2022
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review of a Registrar's decision under r 2.26 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) to reject documents for filing – application for orders under s 11(1) of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) and under r 31.01(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether the original application and accompanying documents are frivolous and vexatious – application dismissed.
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5(1), 11(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37AM(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.26, 31.01(1)
Cases cited: Ferdinands v Registrar Cridland [2021] FCA 592 Ferdinands v Registrar Cridland [2022] FCAFC 80 Ferdinands v Registrar Parkyn [2020] FCA 1676 Nyoni v Murphy [2018] FCAFC 75; (2018) 261 FCR 164
Division: General Division
Registry: South Australia
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 38
Date of last submission/s: 31 March 2022
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant was self-represented
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent filed a Submitting Notice
ORDERS SAD 10 of 2022
BETWEEN: TREVOR KINGSLEY FERDINANDS Applicant
AND: SUSIE STONE, JUDICIAL REGISTRAR, FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate