Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Goyal, in the matter of Biotech Energy Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) v Keane [2022] FCA 631 File numbers: NSD 393 of 2022 NSD 395 of 2022
Judgment of: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 27 May 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — urgent ex parte applications for asset preservation and search orders — where strong prima facie case establishing real risk of dissipation of assets and destruction of incriminating information — applications granted
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.39, 7.1, 10.24
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 5
Date of hearing: 27 May 2022
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Mr D Stack
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Baker & McKenzie
ORDERS NSD 393 of 2022 IN THE MATTER OF BIOTECH ENERGY PTY LTD (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) ACN 653 465 644 AND ANOTHER
BETWEEN: RAHUL GOYAL AND CATHERINE MARGARET CONNEELY IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS JOINT RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS OF CERTAIN ASSETS OF BIOTECH ENERGY PTY LTD (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) ACN 653 465 644 First Plaintiff
BIOTECH ENERGY PTY LTD (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) ACN 653 465 644 Second Plaintiff
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate