Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Tayeh v 113 134 964 Pty Ltd (formerly Chase Building Group Pty Ltd) (in liq) [2022] FCA 649 File number(s): NSD 402 of 2022
Judgment of: HALLEY J
Date of judgment: 1 June 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 2 June 2022
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – uncontested application for replacement of liquidator of three companies placed into liquidation by Court order and one by a members' resolution – current liquidator resigning as liquidator for personal reasons – where the resigning liquidator and appointees were partners of the same firm – leave to dispense with obligation imposed by s 90-15(1) of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) and 70-30 of the Insolvency Practice Rules (Corporations) 2016 (Cth) – application granted
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 473A, 523 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations), Schedule 2, s 90-15 Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) r 2.8 Insolvency Practice Rules (Corporations) 2016 (Cth) r 70-30
Cases cited: Lock, in the matter of Lock [2021] FCA 682
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 24
Date of hearing: 1 June 2022
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Mr G McDonald
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Gavin Parsons and Associates
Counsel for the Defendants: The Defendants did not appear
ORDERS NSD 402 of 2022
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate