Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
The Nyamal Palyku Proceeding (No 6) [2022] FCA 666 File numbers: WAD 392 of 2018 WAD 20 of 2019 WAD 23 of 2019 WAD 483 of 2018
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 8 June 2022
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 73(1)(d)
Cases cited: Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Native Title
Number of paragraphs: 18
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Solicitor for the Nyamal Applicant: Mr T Keely SC with Mr J Edwards of Arma Legal
Solicitor for the Palyku Applicants: Mr V Hughston SC with Ms T Jowett of Cross Country Native Title Services
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr G Ranson of the State Solicitor's Office
ORDERS WAD 392 of 2018
WAD 20 of 2019
WAD 23 of 2019
WAD 483 of 2018
BETWEEN: KEVIN CHARLES ALLEN AND OTHERS Nyamal #1 Applicant
TAMMY O'CONNOR AND OTHERS Palyku Applicant
KEVIN STREAM AND OTHERS Palyku #2 Applicant
AND: STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS Respondents
order made by: COLVIN J DATE OF ORDER: 8 june 2022
THE COURT DIRECTS THAT:
1. The description of exhibit 53 be amended to read 'Affidavit of Mr John Marquis Edwards dated 7 May 2022 excluding paragraphs 6 (as to second and third sentences), 8 (as to the words 'he said he got from Lindsay Hardcase'), 11, 13 and 14.' Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate