Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCA 694 File number(s): NSD 1272 of 2020
Judgment of: RAPER J
Date of judgment: 15 June 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – interlocutory application seeking a writ of peremptory mandamus or an order in the nature of mandamus directing the Minister to grant the visa – where the Minister had not been satisfied that the grant of the visa was in the national interest under cl 790.227 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – where the Full Court issued a writ of mandamus requiring the Minister to determine the appellant's application for a visa according to law – where the appellant alleged there had been unreasonable delay on the Minister's part in complying with the Court's order – whether the Court should make supplemental orders in the form sought – application allowed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 19 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 38(2) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 5AA, s 5H(1), s 36(2)(a), s 46A, s 65, s 66(2), s 233C, s 501(1), s 501(3) Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 54A, r 17 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) High Court Rules 2004 (Cth) r 25.13.4 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) cl 790.227 Federal Court of Australia Rules (Amendment) 1988 No. 54 (Cth) Select Legislative Instrument 1988 No. 54 (Cth) Explanatory Statement
Cases cited: Applicant S422 of 2022 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 89; 138 FCR 151 AQM18 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 27; 268 FCR 424 ASP15 v Commonwealth [2016] FCAFC 145; 248 FCR 372 BAL19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 2189 Thornton v Repatriation Commission (1981) 52 FLR 285; 35 ALR 485 BFW20 by his Litigation Representative BFW20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 562 BHL19 v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2022] FCA 313 Davis v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2021] FCA 1446 DFE16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 1151 ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCCA 2653 ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 217 EPU19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 541 EVX20 v Minister of Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1079 FAK19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 1571 KDSP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 108; 279 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v BFW20 By His Litigation Representative BFW20A [2020] FCA 615 Plaintiff S297/2013 (No 1) [2014] HCA 24; 255 CLR 179 Plaintiff S297/2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2015] HCA 3; 255 CLR 231 Sebastian v State of Western Australia [2008] FCA 926
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate