Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Vaccination-Risks Network Incorporated v Secretary, Department of Health (No 2) [2022] FCA 706 File number(s): NSD 52 of 2022
Judgment of: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 20 June 2022
Catchwords: COSTS – circumstances in which the Court may depart from the ordinary rule as to costs in the exercise of discretion under s 43(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – applicant wholly unsuccessful in invoking the Court's jurisdiction in its application for mandamus, declaratory relief and judicial review and its application for joinder of second applicant – whether public interest considerations warrant departure from the ordinary rule as to costs – where proceeding alleged to raise novel and significant issues – where no special circumstances justifying departure from ordinary rule as to costs – where no merit in the applicant's claim of disentitling conduct by the respondent contrary to Commonwealth model litigant principles or otherwise – applicant to pay respondent's costs
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43(2) Legal Services Directions 2017 app B
Cases cited: Australian Vaccination-Risks Network Incorporated v Secretary, Department of Health [2022] FCA 320 Booth v Bosworth [2001] FCA 1718 Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59; (1990) 170 CLR 534 Northern Territory v Sangare [2019] HCA 25; (2019) 265 CLR 164 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCA 1865; (2001) 115 FCR 229
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate