Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Lo Pilato (Trustee) v Gold Coast Hinterland Tree Houses Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 814 File number: QUD 12 of 2022
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 7 July 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to amend statement of claim – where proceeding already set down for final hearing in October 2022 – where amendment proposed to bring additional claims against existing respondent – where no evidence of reasons for delay in seeking amendment – where inferential explanation that basis for amendment arose following involvement of additional counsel – where factual substratum of proposed amendment known at time of commencement of proceeding – where evidence of respondents' solicitor disclosed significant additional expense in preparing proceeding for trial if amendment allowed – where prospect that amendment would place existing trial dates in jeopardy – where trial would be delayed to March 2023 – leave to amend refused
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 120 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37N Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 8.21
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Cement Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2010) 187 FCR 261 Lynch v Cash Converters Personal Finance Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1536 Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm), in the matter of Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) [2015] FCA 1098
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate