Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Malone on behalf of the Western Kangoulu People v State of Queensland (No 3) [2022] FCA 827 File number: QUD 17 of 2019
Judgment of: O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2022
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – evidentiary rulings – objections to evidence in anthropological report – principles governing admissibility of expert opinion evidence and hearsay basis materials – where expert anthropological witness relied upon opinions of other anthropologists not being called as witnesses in the proceeding – opinions of other anthropologists admissible to prove the foundation of the expert witness' opinion pursuant to ss 60 and/or 77 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – hearsay opinions not admissible to show that they are in harmony with expert witness' opinion – where applicant proposed to tender materials prepared by other anthropologists not being called as witnesses in the proceeding – materials of other anthropologists admissible in so far as they are a foundation for the opinions of the anthropologist giving expert evidence in the proceeding, but not otherwise – not appropriate to dispense with rules of evidence NATIVE TITLE – principles governing admissibility of anthropological evidence and basis material
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 59, 60, 63, 72, 76, 77, 79, 135, 136, 192A Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 61, 82 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 30.01
Cases cited: Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 5) (1996) 64 FCR 73 Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2008] FCA 559; 76 IPR 618 Alyawarr, Kaytetye, Warumungu, Wakay Native Title Claim Group v Northern Territory [2004] FCA 472; 207 ALR 539 Blucher on behalf of the Gaangalu Nation People v State of Queensland [2018] FCA 1621 Bodney v Bennell (2008) 167 FCR 84 Borowski v Quayle [1966] VR 382 Daniels v Western Australia [2000] FCA 858; 178 ALR 542 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588 English Exporters (London) Ltd v Eldonwall Ltd [1973] Ch 415 Gumana v Northern Territory (2005) 141 FCR 457 Harrington-Smith & Ors on behalf of the Wongatha People v Western Australia (No 2) (2003) 130 FCR 424 Jango v Northern Territory (No 2) [2004] FCA 1004 Lardil, Kaiadilt, Yangkaal, Gangalidda Peoples v Queensland [2000] FCA 1548 Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594 Lithgow City Council v Jackson (2011) 244 CLR 352 Malone on behalf of the Western Kangoulu People v State of Queensland [2020] FCA 1188 Miller v State of South Australia (Far West Coast Sea Claim) (No 3) [2022] FCA 466 Neowarra v Western Australia (2003) 134 FCR 208 Quick v Stoland Pty Ltd (1998) 87 FCR 371 R v Deputy Industrial Injuries Commissioner, ex parte Moore [1965] 1 QB 456 Risk v Northern Territory [2006] FCA 404 TJ (on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People) v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2015] FCA 1359
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate