Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Limited [2022] FCA 851 Appeal from: Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 75
File number: WAD 41 of 2022
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 20 July 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - leave to appeal from summary dismissal of claim - no doubt about correctness of primary decision - leave refused
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 22.02, 22.04, 26.01 Defamation Act 2005 (WA) s 28
Cases cited: Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Limited [2022] FCA 227 Ogbonna v CTI Logistics Ltd [2021] WASCA 25 Re Macks; Ex parte Saint [2000] HCA 62; (2000) 204 CLR 158 Speight v Gosnay (1891) 60 LJQB 231 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Limited [2015] HCA 28; (2015) 256 CLR 507
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 42
Date of hearing: 13 July 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr C Slater
Solicitor for the Respondents: Jackson McDonald
ORDERS WAD 41 of 2022
BETWEEN: CELESTINE OGBONNA Applicant
AND: CTI LOGISTICS LIMITED (ACN 008 778 925) First Respondent
NEIL RASPA Second Respondent
JUSTIN PETER SIMS Third Respondent THOMAS PETER WILSON Fourth Respondent DAVID ANDERSON MELLOR Fifth Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate