Elvin v Fair Work Ombudsman [2022] FCA 881

Federal Court of Australia

Elvin v Fair Work Ombudsman [2022] FCA 881 File number(s): ACD 104 of 2021

Judgment of: ABRAHAM J

Date of judgment: 29 July 2022

Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time and leave to appeal – where no relevant judgment means court does not have jurisdiction – where leave to appeal not granted from orders interlocutory in nature – application refused

Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 4(a), 24, 37M

Cases cited: Bellamy's Australia Limited v Basil [2019] FCAFC 147; (2019) 372 ALR 638 Bienstein v Bienstein [2003] HCA 7; (2003) 195 ALR 225 Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 1) [1981] HCA 20; (1981) 147 CLR 246 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Registered Organisations Commissioner (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 56 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 655; (1991) 33 FCR 397 EBT17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 200 Fair Work Ombudsman v Foot & Thai Massage Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 4) [2021] FCA 1242 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen [1984] FCA 186; (1984) 3 FCR 344 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1572; (2000) 104 FCR 564 MZABP v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2015] FCA 1391; (2015) 242 FCR 585 Nationwide News Pty Limited v Rush [2018] FCAFC 70 Parker v The Queen [2002] FCAFC 133 Plaintiff S164/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] HCA 51; (2018) 361 ALR 8 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; (2011) 217 FCR 238 Snowside Pty Ltd as trustee for the Snowside Trust, in the matter Boart Longyear Ltd [2019] FCA 2159