Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
The Epoch Holding Group Pty Ltd v Carrodus [2022] FCA 947 File number(s): NSD 527 of 2022
Judgment of: CHEESEMAN J
Date of judgment: 16 August 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where non-publication orders previously made in respect of evidence –where the evidence contains commercially sensitive information the subject of the proceedings – whether non-publication orders are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice – whether non-publication orders previously made ought be continued – Held: non-publication orders continued until further order.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37AF, 37AG
Cases cited: Country Care Group Pty Ltd v DPP (Cth) (No 2) [2020] FCAFC 44; 275 FCR 377 Objectivision Pty Ltd v Visionsearch Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1087 Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd (2008) 169 FCR 435; [2008] FCAFC 133 Optiver Australia v Tibra Trading [2007] FCA 2065; 247 ALD 199
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Number of paragraphs: 15
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submission/s: 15 August 2022
Solicitor for the Applicants: King & Wood Mallesons
Solicitor for the Respondent: Watson Webb
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT NSD 527 of 2022
BETWEEN: THE EPOCH HOLDING GROUP PTY LTD ACN 169 456 517 (and others named in the schedule) First Applicant
AND: TOBY GAVIN CARRODUS Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate