Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
MetLife Insurance Limited v Australian Financial Complaints Authority (No 4) [2022] FCA 1020 File number: NSD 747 of 2019
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 1 September 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to vary interlocutory costs orders - where orders were made that there be no order as to the costs of the proceedings - where application seeks the costs of the costs hearing - where applicant seeks to vary the orders if the Court overlooked its submission - finality of judicial decision making - application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 39.05
Cases cited: Caratti v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2021] FCA 1067 Herijanto v Refugee Review Tribunal [2000] HCA 16 Herijanto v Refugee Review Tribunal (No 2) [2000] HCA 21 MetLife Insurance Limited v Australian Financial Complaints Authority (No 3) [2022] FCA 849
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 19
Date of hearing: 30 August 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S Robertson with Ms C Langford
Solicitor for the Applicant: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr AF Solomon-Bridge
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Arslan Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear
Counsel for the Cross-Claimant: Mr AF Solomon-Bridge
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate