Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Saltmere on behalf of the Indjalandji-Dhidhanu People v Northern Territory of Australia (Rocklands Pastoral Lease Proceeding) [2022] FCA 1040 File numbers: NTD 25 of 2019 NTD 6030 of 2001 (PART A) NTD 6016 of 2002 (PART A)
Judgment of: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 8 September 2022
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – application for consent determination of native title – where parties filed minute of proposed orders and determination of native title – where the applicants and the first respondent prepared an agreed statement of facts – whether the preconditions in ss 87 and 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) satisfied – whether proposed orders and determination within the power of the Court – whether appropriate to make proposed orders and determination – held: orders and determination made
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), ss 29, 56, 57, 66, 87, 87A, 94A, 225
Cases cited: Freddie v Northern Territory [2017] FCA 867 Saltmere on behalf of the Indjalandji-Dhidhanu People v State of Queensland [2012] FCA 1423
Division: General Division
Registry: Northern Territory
National Practice Area: Native Title
Number of paragraphs: 44
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate