Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kathryn Stanford Consulting PTE v Google LLC [2022] FCA 1049 File number(s): QUD 290 of 2022
Judgment of: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 7 September 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PPROCEDURE – ex parte application for service of originating application for order for discovery on prospective respondent outside of Australia – whether criteria in rules 10.42 and 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) satisfied – whereas Australia and the United States are contracting states to the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters – registered post is an acceptable means of service in this proceeding – relevant criteria met by the prospective applicant – application granted
Legislation: Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (concluded on 15 November 1965) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: AIA Australia Ltd v Richards [2017] FCA 84 Barilaro v Shanks-Markovina (No 1) [2021] FCA 789 Kabbabe v Google LLC [2020] FCA 126 Lin v Google [2021] FCA 1113 Musicki v Google LLC [2021] FCA 1393
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 25
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate