Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Ixom Operations Pty Ltd v Blue One Shipping SA [2022] FCA 1101 File number(s): NSD 1266 of 2020
Judgment of: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 19 September 2022
Catchwords: ADMIRALTY – demise charter – where owner not a party to contract of carriage evidenced by bill of lading – where extensions to limitation period on bringing a claim over contaminated cargo given to the consignee of the cargo by lawyers acting for both owner and demise charterer of vessel – where consignee only brought proceedings initially against owner – where demise charterer sought to rely on limitation period – meaning of 'owner' – extension found to be granted on behalf of demise charterer CONSUMER LAW – whether conduct of owner and demise charterer regarding extensions to the limitation period amounted to a contravention of section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law – whether contributory negligence reduced any damages to which the consignee may be entitled ESTOPPEL – whether owner of vessel estopped from denying it was a party to the contract of carriage evidenced by the bill of lading – whether demise charterer estopped from relying on limitation period
Legislation: Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (Cth) s 8, Sch 1A, Amended Hague Visby Rules Arts 1, 3 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 87CB, 137B, Sch 2, Australian Consumer Law s 18 Sea-Carriage Documents Act 1997 (NSW) ss 5, 8
Cases cited: Air Tahiti Nui Pty Ltd v McKenzie [2009] NSWCA 429; 77 NSWLR 299 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Reality Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60; 218 CLR 592 Commonwealth v Verwayen [1990] HCA 39; 170 CLR 394 Con-Stan Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Norwich Winterthur Insurance (Australia) Ltd [1986] HCA 14; 160 CLR 226 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd [2010] HCA 31; 241 CLR 357 Miller Heiman Pty Ltd v Sales Principles Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 106; 94 NSWLR 500 Pacol Ltd v Trade Line Ltd (The "Henrik Sif") [1982] 1 Lloyds Rep 456 Sidhu v van Dyke [2014] HCA 19; 251 CLR 505 Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133 The "Stolt Loyalty" [1993] 2 Lloyds Rep 281 The "Stolt Loyalty" [1995] 1 Lloyds Rep 598 (CA) The August Leonhardt [1985] 1 Lloyds Rep 28 Tritton Resources Pty Ltd v Ever Rock Navigation S.A. [2019] FCA 276; 369 ALR 205 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher [1988] HCA 7; 164 CLR 387
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate