Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Rakman International Pty Limited v Boss Fire & Safety Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 1113 File numbers: NSD 1589 of 2018 NSD 641 of 2019 NSD 1242 of 2019
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 20 September 2022
Catchwords: COSTS – whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis in light of failures to accept offers of compromise PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – form of final orders – application for injunction restraining applicants/cross-respondents from making representations found to constitute misleading or deceptive conduct – injunction refused
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 18(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 43(1), 43(2), 43(3) Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 117(1), 128(1) Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 41, 42, 42(b), 44, 44(1), 58, 59, 60, 62, 62A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.35, 15.10(2), 15.10, 25.01 – 25.05, 25.14, 25.14(1), 25.14(2), 25.14(3), 40.01, Pt 25
Cases cited: Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International N.V. (No 2) [2007] FCAFC 121 Rakman International Pty Limited v Boss Fire & Safety Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 464 Sydney Equine Coaches Pty Ltd v Gorst [2017] FCAFC 34
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate