Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lo Pilato (Trustee), in the matter of Ghougassian (Bankrupt) v Ghougassian [2022] FCA 1117 File numbers: NSD 116 of 2022 NSD 117 of 2022
Judgment of: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 20 September 2022
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – application by trustee in bankruptcy for orders that his summonses be heard and determined prior to the respondents' cross-claims – whether, in the exercise of the Court's discretion, it is appropriate to depart from the ordinary course that all issues should be determined at one time – whether it is just and convenient for the summonses to be heard and determined prior to the cross-claims – applications granted
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M, s 37P Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 66G
Cases cited: Barclays Bank v Tom (1923) 1 KB 221 Buurabalayji Thalanyji Aboriginal Corporation v Onslow Salt Pty Ltd (No 4) [2019] FCA 1275 Han Jing Pty Ltd v Nestle Australia Limited [2021] FCA 143 In the matter of St Gregory's Armenian School [2015] NSWSC 1465 Ramsay Health Care Australia Pty Ltd v Compton (2017) 261 CLR 132 Shrimp v Landmark Operations Limited (2007) 163 FCR 510 Sistrom v Urh [1992] 40 FCR 550; 117 ALR 528 Sutherland v Ghougassian [2012] NSWSC 125 Wren v Mahony (1972) 126 CLR 212
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate