Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Patrick v Australian Information Commissioner [2022] FCA 1123 File number(s): VID 519 of 2021
Judgment of: WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 19 September 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by the respondent to amend concise statement to raise new ground of objection – application by the respondent for an extension of time within which to file notice of objection to competency under r 31.05(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – applications granted – consequential vacation of hearing of trial of separate question – hearing refixed
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) sections 7(1) Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rules 1.39, 31.05(1), 31.24, 31.31, 33.30, 36.72, 40.51 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) order 52 r 18(3), order 54 r 4 Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) sections 54N, 55K(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Industry Research and Development Board (unreported, 16 November 1992)
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 13
Date of hearing: 19 September 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms T Acreman
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mahony's Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms Z Maud
Solicitor for the Respondent Norton Rose Fulbright
ORDERS VID 519 of 2021
BETWEEN: REX PATRICK Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate