Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BCI Media Pty Ltd v CoreLogic Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1128 File number: NSD 285 of 2021
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 23 September 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to strike out proceeding against fourth respondent and to strike out applicant's statement of claim (or specific paragraphs of it) pursuant to r 16.21 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – application for leave to file amended originating application and amended statement of claim and to join additional respondents
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) s 18 Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.25, 16.02(1)(b) – (d), 16.02(2)(c) – (e), 16.21, 16.51, 16.52, 34.35
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Fortescue Metals Group Ltd [2011] FCAFC 19; 190 FCR 364 BCI Media Group Pty Ltd v CoreLogic Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] FCA 884 Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] HCA 486; 247 CLR 486
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 108
Date of hearing: 5 April 2022
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate