Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Hurst, in the matter of Lloyds Curry Shop Pty Ltd (in liq) v Prasad (No 2) [2022] FCA 1133 File number: NSD 797 of 2021
Judgment of: CHEESEMAN J
Date of judgment: 23 September 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where decision reserved – interlocutory application for leave to adduce further evidence – where evidence publicly available and could have been obtained with reasonable diligence – where no explanation for failure to obtain and adduce evidence at the hearing of the application or for delay in bringing application to adduce the evidence after decision reserved – where further evidence potentially significant – where respondents did not point to specific prejudice – where grant of leave likely to avoid further interlocutory application and reduce continued inefficient conduct of the proceedings – Held: leave granted to adduce the evidence
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37M, 37N
Cases cited: Colin R Price & Associates Pty Ltd v Four Oaks Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 75 F.Y.D. Investments Pty Ltd v Promptair Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1097 Hakea Holdings Pty Ltd v McGrath [2021] FCA 660 Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw [2006] FCA 22
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate