Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Heers (Trustee), in the matter of Priest (Bankrupt) v Priest [2022] FCA 1139 File number: QUD 324 of 2022
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 19 September 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Ex parte application for freezing orders and ancillary orders in respect of identified assets – where Bankrupt failed to disclose assets to the Trustees in bankruptcy – where balance of convenience favours the making of freezing orders – freezing order granted – where ancillary orders sought by the Trustees – ancillary orders refused
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 54(1), 58(1), 116(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.32, 7.33, 7.34
Cases cited: Rambaldi (Trustee) v Sumpton, in the matter of the Bankrupt Estate of Sumpton [2021] FCA 1199
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 17
Date of Interlocutory Hearing: 19 September 2022
Solicitor for the Applicants: Mr A Lambros of Bennett & Philp Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondents: The Respondents did not appear
ORDERS QUD 324 of 2022 IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF TERRANCE JAMES PRIEST BETWEEN: ANDREW HEERS AND MARK PEARCE AS JOINT AND SEVERAL TRUSTEES OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF TERRANCE JAMES PRIEST Applicants
AND: TERRANCE JAMES PRIEST First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate