Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BHY17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1146 Appeal from: BHY17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FedCFamC2G 341
File number: VID 5 of 2022
Judgment of: MCEVOY J
Date of judgment: 26 September 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to affirm a decision of a delegate of the Minister not to grant protection visas – denial of procedural fairness by Tribunal – failure to put applicants on notice of conclusion that reports to police were fraudulent – breach of s 425 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) error of law – appeal allowed – decision of the Tribunal quashed – remitted to Tribunal for determination according to law.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 65, 422B(1), 425
Cases cited: BHY17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FedCFamC2G 341 Boensch v Pascoe (2019) 268 CLR 593; [2019] HCA 49 DCP17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 290 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421; [2019] HCA 3 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services, and Multicultural Affairs v Viane (2021) 395 ALR 403; [2021] HCA 41 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152; [2006] HCA 63 SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 81 ALJR 1190; [2007] HCA 26
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate