Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Wilkinson v Wilson Security Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 1161 File number: WAD 138 of 2021
Judgment of: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 27 September 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 28 September 2022
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS - orders previously made declassing the proceedings subject to any objection by a group member - where representative applicant is a litigant in person - where there exist over 200 group members - where 41 written objections received - where representative applicant did not object to declassing orders - where group members expressed a willingness to allow representative applicant to continue to conduct proceedings - whether a representative applicant may appear in person - declassing orders made
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: Damjanovic v Maley [2002] NSWCA 230; (2002) 55 NSWLR 149 Flightdeck Geelong Pty Ltd v All Options Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 138; (2020) 280 FCR 479 Macartney v The Queen [2006] WASCA 29; (2006) 31 WAR 416 Wilkinson v Wilson Security Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 756
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 13
Date of hearing: 27 September 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms R Howe
Solicitor for the Respondents: Seyfarth Shaw Australia
ORDERS WAD 138 of 2021
BETWEEN: PETER LESLIE WILKINSON Applicant
AND: WILSON SECURITY PTY LTD (ABN 90 127 406 295) First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate