Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Chambers v Commissioner of Taxation [2022] FCA 1163 File number: QUD 422 of 2021
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 30 September 2022
Catchwords: SUPERANNUATION – Application for review of decision of Commissioner of Taxation – where AAT found that the decision was not reviewable by the Tribunal under s 25 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – whether Tribunal erred in refusing to remit the matter to Commissioner for redetermination – where applicant contends decision is reviewable under s 20P of the Superannuation (Unclaimed Money and Lost Members) Act 1999 (Cth) – where s 20P does not operate to make decision reviewable under s 25 of AAT Act – where applicant alleged apprehended bias on part of President of AAT – where no such bias established – proceeding dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 25, 28(5), 42A(4), 42D, 45(1) and 69 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5(1) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 78B Superannuation (Unclaimed Money and Lost Members) Act 1999 (Cth) ss 20C and 20P Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Pt IVC s 14ZZ
Cases cited: Abebe v Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 197 CLR 510 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v CG Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd (1999) 95 FCR 292 Charisteas v Charisteas (2021) 393 ALR 289; [2021] HCA 29 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Griffith University v Tang (2005) 221 CLR 99 Re Adams and Tax Agents' Board (1976) 1 ALD 251 Re Staats and National Archives of Australia (2009) 50 AAR 147; [2009] AATA 58 Trajkovski v Telstra Corporation Ltd (1998) 81 FCR 459
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate