Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Cleanaway Operations Pty Ltd v Torr [2022] FCA 1172 File number: VID 416 of 2022
Judgment of: MCEVOY J
Date of judgment: 30 September 2022
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – parties promoted consent orders setting aside decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal which set aside a reviewable decision made by the applicant denying the respondent's claim for compensation pursuant to s 14 of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) – orders of Tribunal made in error – consent orders made COSTS – certificate under s 6 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth)
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) s 6 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 5A(1), 14
Cases cited: Bradken Limited v Norcast S.ár.L (2013) 219 FCR 101; [2013] FCAFC 123 Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission v May (2016) 257 CLR 468; [2016] HCA 19 Telstra Corporation Limited v Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (2008) 166 FCR 64; [2008] FCAFC 7 VNPC v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 921
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 7
Date of hearing: 30 September 2022
Place: Melbourne
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Clark
Solicitor for the Applicant: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate