Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Batey-Smith v Vasco Trustees Limited [2022] FCA 1203 File number(s): VID 787 of 2020
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 12 October 2022
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – approval of proposed settlement of proceeding pursuant to ss 33V and 33ZF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – settlement approved
Legislation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 33V, 33ZF, 37AF, 37AF(1)(b), 37AG, 37AG(1)(a)
Cases cited: Blairgowrie Trading Ltd v Allco Finance Group Ltd (receivers and managers appointed) (in liq) [2017] FCA 330; (2017) 343 ALR 476 Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] FCA 637 Clime Capital Ltd v UGL Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 257 Dyczynski v Gibson (2020) 280 FCR 583 Williams v FAI Home Security Pty Ltd (No 4) [2000] FCA 1925; (2000) 180 ALR 459
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 108
Date of hearing: 4 October 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr J Stoljar SC with Mr D Snyder
Solicitor for the Applicant: Slater and Gordon
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr MP O'Haire
Solicitor for the Respondents: Johnson Winter & Slattery
ORDERS VID 787 of 2020
BETWEEN: HELEN BATEY-SMITH Applicant AND: VASCO TRUSTEES LIMITED (ACN 138 715 009) First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate