Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ahamed v Secretary, Department of Human Services [2022] FCA 1207 Appeal from: Ahamed v Secretary, Department of Human Services [2021] FCA 1441
File number: VID 757 of 2021
Judgment of: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 12 October 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for extension of time and leave to appeal from orders upholding a notice of objection to competency – s 44 Administrative Appeal Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – whether decision of primary judge that notice of appeal from AAT failed to disclose a question of law attended with sufficient doubt – application dismissed.
Legislation: Administrative Appeal Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 33.12, 35.13, 35.14, 36.03 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 24, 1216, 1218
Cases cited: ALDI Foods Pty Limited as General Partner of Aldi Stores (A Limited Partnership) v Transport Workers' Union of Australia (2020) 282 FCR 174 Avetmiss Easy Pty Ltd v Australian Skills Qualifications Authority [2014] FCA 314 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation (2015) 233 FCR 315 Luck v Secretary, Department of Human Services [2014] FCA 1060 SZAJB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship 168 FCR 410
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate